Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision |
balug:offered_wanted_hardware_etc [2020-01-18T14:01:44+0000]
– removed the obtained (from wanted); formatting tweaks michael_paoli |
|---|
| Next revisionBoth sides next revision |
balug:offered_wanted_hardware_etc [2020-02-25T04:09:55+0000]
– dropped Brother Model: MFC-210C S/N: U61083H4F319287 (returned it to from whence it came) michael_paoli |
|---|
|
| |wanted |memory DDR2 667 MHz 1GiB ECC | | | | up to 2|<Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>|Help upgrade hardware BALUG & SF-LUG runs on regularly but not most of the time (essentially anytime my laptop isn't available at home) | |
| |offered |Computer case and peripherals |Antec MicroATX mini-tower computer case ||| 1|<acohen36@gmail.com> |Computer case; SU-300 switching power supply and extra p.s.u. (300W peak power); P-ATA CD-RW drives; P-ATA/EIDE hard disk drives capacity >= 120GB ; EIDE ribbon cables; standard power cables | |
|offered |all-in-one inkjet/scanner/FAX/... |Brother |MFC-210C |U61083H4F319287 | 1|<Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>|[[http://support.brother.com/g/b/spec.aspx?c=us&lang=en&prod=mfc210c_all|Specifications ...]] Makes for good scanner with [[http://www.sane-project.org/|SANE]] on, e.g. Linux (I used it for such some years ago); printing? - probably needs TLC to unclog + newer ink (cartridges) (of course) - printed fine when I tried it years ago, but not again years later - even with new ink cartridge, lots of media slots, FAX capable, I have archives of relevant materials from Brother web sites, some (bottom) plastic might be due bit of TLC too (wasn't ideally stored)| |
| |offered |Gig unmanaged switch & power supply|D-Link |DGS-1005D |DR1914C001239 | 1|<Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>|It's dead - but likely not both the power supply and the switch itself | |
| |offered |hard drive 1TB SATA |Seagate |ST31000NSSUN1.0T|9QJ3NDRE | 1|<Michael.Paoli@cal.berkeley.edu>|NOT for important data! 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 512 byte blocks/sectors The SMART data is scary (e.g.: ATTRIBUTE_NAME:Seek_Error_Rate FAIL:NOW RAW_VALUE:185787439933046), but regardless - I was able to do badblocks(8) -sw on the entire drive with zero hard errors. Maybe for your RAID-6 experiments, or that extra backup that's not at all critical, or ??? | |
